The liquid fuel distributor community across the UK and Ireland has long highlighted concerns around the consumer impact of current decarbonisation policy. This update on the Scottish bill appears to support that view – signalling a growing recognition that the transition to low-carbon domestic heating must be both fair and financially viable – not a blanket push for electrification at all costs.
Acting net zero Secretary Gillian Martin announced that the bill, originally drafted under the influence of the Scottish Greens as part of the Bute House Agreement, will not proceed in its current form. The key reason? It would “make people poorer.” Instead, Martin stressed the need for a revised bill that simultaneously reduces carbon emissions while also tackling fuel poverty – a stance long advocated by many within our industry.
The original legislation proposed strict timelines for replacing fossil-fuel boilers with heat pumps following the sale of a home. However, concerns mounted over the financial strain this would impose on homeowners, particularly given the high installation costs of heat pumps and the ongoing cost-of-living crisis. Martin’s decision to scrap the bill in its present form underscores the importance of ensuring that the transition to low-carbon heating does not disproportionately impact those who can least afford it.
Contentious
A ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach that prioritises electrification without considering affordability and feasibility has long been a point of contention. The Scottish Government’s latest move suggests a greater willingness to acknowledge these concerns and revisit a more inclusive pathway to low carbon heating. For the liquid fuel distribution industry, it further reinforces the central role for low-carbon liquid fuels in any heating transition strategy.
Predictably, reactions to the decision have been polarised. Scottish Green co-leader Patrick Harvie, who drafted the bill, criticised the move, arguing that it undermines Scotland’s climate ambitions and delays necessary action to move away from fossil fuels. Meanwhile, environmental groups like WWF Scotland have called it a “deeply concerning” step back in addressing fuel poverty through renewable heating solutions.
However, critics of the original bill, including the Scottish Conservatives, welcomed the decision, describing the previous proposals as “completely unrealistic” and “financially punitive.” Their calls for a fairer approach to decarbonisation echo industry arguments for the inclusion of low carbon liquid fuels as a viable transition technology.
The Scottish Government’s move aligns with a broader shift from rigid decarbonisation policies to more pragmatic, socially responsible approaches. Last year’s decision to scrap Scotland’s annual and interim emissions reduction targets in favour of a more flexible five-year measurement framework also reflects a shift towards feasibility over strict ideology.
Pragmatic and equitable
As policymakers reconsider their stance on domestic heating, it is vital to continue to push for greater recognition of low carbon liquid fuels as part of the solution. To achieve a just transition, a mix of solutions must be included that consider consumer choice, cost-effectiveness, and existing infrastructure.
The Scottish Government has taken a step back to reassess – a move that could set an important precedent for the rest of the UK. Our industry must continue to engage with policymakers, to ensure that future heating policies embrace a pragmatic and equitable path to net zero, rather than an unrealistic push for electrification at any cost.
Image from Dreamstime